۱۳۸۸ مهر ۷, سه‌شنبه

بیانیه گروهی از دانشگاهیان و فعالین ایرانی ضد جنگ در خارج از کشور درباره اوضاع اخیر

۱۱ مرداد ۱۳۸۸
این گروه پس از تحلیل مختصری از شرایط ایران با برنامه پیشنهادی خود در چند بند، از جمله از دولت های خارجی می خواهند که اکیدا از دخالت در امور ایران و بی ثبات نمودن اوضاع این کشور، دوری گزینند و از دولت جمهوری اسلامی هم خواهان رعایت حقوق مدنی مردم، آزادی دستگیرشدگان و ….می باشند
بیانیه زیر به انگلیسی از سوی گروهی از «دانشگاهیان و فعالین ضد جنگ» ایرانی خارج کشور انتشار یافته است.این بیانیه چنین آغاز کرده است:
” ما گروهی از دانشگاهیان و فعالین ضد جنگ ایرانی با دیدگاههای مختلف سیاسی در آمریکا و اروپا هستیم که در چند سال گذشته پیگیرانه از حقوق ملی ایران ، منجمله در زمینه انرژی هسته ای در برابر تبلیغات دروغین و جوسازی فریبکارانه رسانه های جمعی غرب و اسرائیل دفاع کرده ایم و علیه سیاست های آمریکا و متحدین اروپائی اش- منجمله ارسال پرونده هسته ای ایران به شورای امنیت با صدور قطعنامه های تحریم علیه ایران، اقدامات آشکار و نهان برای ایجاد محیط تشنج و بی ثبات سازی در داخل کشور و تهمیدات مکرر آمریکا و اسرائیل جهت مداخله نظامی و بمباران مراکز اتمی ایران فعالانه مبارزه نموده ایم.”
این گروه پس از تحلیل مختصری از شرایط ایران با برنامه پیشنهادی خود در چند بند، از جمله از دولت های خارجی می خواهند که اکیدا از دخالت در امور ایران و بی ثبات نمودن اوضاع این کشور، دوری گزینند و از دولت جمهوری اسلامی هم خواهان رعایت حقوق مدنی مردم، آزادی دستگیرشدگان و ….می باشند. از جمله امضا کنندگان این بیانیه: پروفسور عباس عدالت، پروفسور پیروز مجتهدزاده، آرشین ادیب مقدم، پروفسور فریده فرهی، پروفسور افشار، فرید مرجایی، رستم پورزال، پروفسور فرزین وحدت، لیلا زند و تنی دیگر از اساتید و فعالین ایرانی هستند.

Truth and reconciliation for Iran
To unify Iran, we suggest greater freedoms, an end to outside interference and a truth and reconciliation commission

Open letter
guardian.co.uk, Friday 31 July 2009 19.00 BST
Article history
We are a group of university educators and antiwar activists with diverse political views who are based in Europe and North America. During the past few years we have been active in defending Iran’s national rights – particularly those relating to the peaceful use of nuclear energy – against the pervasive deception created by western and Israeli-influenced media and official statements. We have consistently taken a stand against the policies of the United States and its allies, including the improper submission of Iran’s nuclear file to the United Nations security council, the imposition of sanction resolutions against Iran, covert destabilisation inside the country and repeated threats of military intervention and bombing of nuclear centres on the part of US and Israel.
At the same time, we have advocated the human rights of individuals and democratic rights for various groups and constituencies in Iran. We have emphasised that the guarantee of such rights is necessary not only for Iran’s social and political advancement, but also for the vital unity of our people against foreign pressures.
In the current post-election crisis, we see it as our duty to share our views based on years of defending Iran’s national rights, and to help develop realistic solutions for the benefit of all our compatriots of whatever political persuasion.
The background to the current situation is the longstanding belligerent policies of the US and its allies, encouraged by the neoconservatives and the Israeli lobby, which peaked during eight years of Republican rule in the White House. Despite President Khatami’s conciliatory approach, exemplified by his promotion of “Dialogue Among Civilisations“, and despite Iran’s co-operation in the overthrow of the Taliban in neighbouring Afghanistan, the administration of George W Bush labelled the Islamic Republic a member of the “axis of evil”. Following the illegal invasion of Iraq, Bush pushed for regime change in Iran. These provocative and confrontational policies played a key role in the defeat of Iranian reformists in the parliamentary elections of 2003 and the presidential election of 2005.
During the past four years, a whole series of policies have targeted Iran’s right to produce nuclear fuel for peaceful energy, including illegitimate UN/US sanctions, repeated implicit and overt threats of military attack by the United States and Israel, overt and covert well-funded US destabilisation operations, and aid to terrorist forces seeking to overthrow the government of Iran. These policies have created fears of an externally-instigated “velvet revolution” in the leadership ranks of the Islamic Republic. These fears were used to justify restrictions of civil and political freedoms promoted by the reformist administration of Khatami and, as a result, civil society and non-governmental organisations suffered a setback.
According to critics, these social and political pressures, along with government mismanagement caused by the removal of competent technocrats, have negatively impacted the public interest and put enormous pressure on the middle class, the educated class, journalists and artists. These people must be allowed a more open and free environment in order to fulfil their instrumental roles in service of the country.
On the basis of the above assessment, and in the interest of resolving the present crisis, we direct all officials and fellow countrymen to the following proposals:
1) Arrests and assaults of reformist and Green movement activists and any use of deadly weapons against the protesters are against the national interest and must be stopped and condemned by the authorities. Of the government of the Islamic Republic, we demand, in accordance with the constitution and for the preservation of national unity, that it release the reformist leaders from detention and observe freedom of the press and other civil rights. Iranian state television and radio must provide time to the protesters to express their views. Permits for nonviolent assembly must be given to the protesters. The government must guarantee the safety of the demonstrators against any violence and those responsible for battering and murdering students and demonstrators must be identified and prosecuted.
2) The current division among the people that separates government supporters and dissenters, under conditions of economic, military and political encirclement, must be reconciled with calm and patient negotiations and reasoning, by condemning any kind of violence and by renouncing name-calling and inflammatory rhetoric. We call on the political forces of both sides to move toward building such a constructive climate and toward creation of an economic, political, and cultural agenda that can respond to all social needs.
3) Of the government of the Islamic Republic, we request that in view of the distrust on the part of a great segment of the country’s population, it form an independent truth and national reconciliation commission with representation from all candidates, such that it can gain the trust of the people of Iran and find a reasonable solution for the conflict. The votes of a great portion of the Iranian society for both Ahmadinejad and Mousavi show that the best solution is negotiations for reconciliation and creation of a government of national unity from the ranks of Principalists and the Green movement and reformists. With a comprehensive programme based on Iran’s national rights and on people’s civil rights, such a government of national unity must address the current challenges facing the country and mobilise in an effective way the totality of human resources and expertise for national development.
4) Of western governments, we request that they cease any and all interference in Iranian affairs and end all their illegitimate economic, political and military pressures aimed at the internal destabilisation of Iran. They need to cease any support for the anti-Islamic Republic opposition and lift the economic and scientific sanctions. The Obama administration should emphasise unconditional negotiations and take steps toward creating a nuclear weapons-free Middle East. Only under these conditions, without any foreign threats, can the Iranian people reach their aspirations of freedom and establish their unity in a framework of independence and national sovereignty.
5) To the leaders of the reformists and the Green movement, we suggest that in order to prevent exploitation of the current crisis by western propaganda and opportunist groups, they unambiguously oppose all sanctions and condemn regime change operations and any foreign support for the anti-Islamic Republic opposition.

Signed:
Dr Arshin Adib-Moghadam, SOAS, University of London
Professor the Baroness Afshar, York University
Mojtaba Aghamohammadi, researcher, University of Arizona
Professor Mohammad Ala, Persian Gulf Task Force
Esfandiar Bakhtiar, Georgia Institute of Technology
Professor Abbas Edalat, Imperial College London
Javad Fakharzadeh, Iran Heritage
Dr Farideh Farhi, University of Hawaii at Manoa
Massy Homayouni, independent antiwar activist
Dr Mehri Honarbin-Holliday, Canterbury Christ Church University
Mojgan Janani, independent antiwar activist
Mohammad Kamaali, Campaign Against Sanctions and Military Intervention in Iran
Fareed Marjaee, writer and democracy activist
Masoud Modarres, independent activist
Professor Pirouz Mojtahedzadeh, Tarbiyat Modarres University
Daniel Pourkesali, Campaign Against Sanctions and Military Intervention in Iran
Rostam Pourzal, Campaign Against Sanctions and Military Intervention in Iran
Dr Mohamad Purqurian, LaaL.org
Manijeh Saba, independent human rights activist
Professor Mehdi Shariati, Kansas College
Professor Nader Sadeghi, George Washington University Hospital
Shirin Saeidi, University of Cambridge
Soraya Sepahpour-Ulrich, independent antiwar activist
Reza Shirazi, Goftogoo TV
Safa Shoaee, Imperial College London
Saeed Soltanpour, Iranian TV Canada
Dr Alireza Rabi, Middle-East Citizens Assembly
Dr Elaheh Rostami, SOAS, University of London
Professor Rahmat Tavakol, Rutgers University
Professor Farzin Vahdat, Harvard University
Leila Zand, Fellowship of Reconciliation

هیچ نظری موجود نیست: